Skip to Content
For art advisors · Acquisitions due diligence

Most artwork fact sheets have been transcribed, never verified.

Source makes provenance verification straightforward to commission, with contributors already based where the records are, checking material against the original before your client commits.

Free to scope. Quoted before you commit. No AI, transparent pricing, findings delivered straight to your inbox.

An open archival ledger, clipped photographic reproductions and research notes on a desk, with an unframed painting on an easel behind

A dedicated research allocation for ongoing acquisitions work

For advisors handling acquisitions on an ongoing basis, we set up a dedicated research allocation, so a piece can be checked without renegotiating scope and budget for each new opportunity. A brief can often be turned around within days.

  • No renegotiation each time a new opportunity arises
  • Every request handled in confidence
  • Matched with the contributor best suited to the piece
  • Briefs often turned around within days
A researcher comparing a catalogue page and an archival print on a lightbox

Provenance and acquisitions due diligence for art advisors

Due diligence on an acquisition is only as reliable as the records behind it. A database entry or a summarised provenance history is a starting point, not a conclusion. It still has to be checked against original material, in the archive or library where it is actually held.

A clipped bundle of typed provenance papers beside a small photographic print of a painting
Acquisitions due diligence

Checked before commitment

A piece’s history verified against the original record, ahead of your client committing to a purchase.

An open typed findings report in a folder, with a clipped reproduction, a loupe and a pencil
Client facing credibility

A paper trail, not just an answer

Findings delivered in writing, with archival references, so there is a paper trail behind every conclusion.

A typed report on a stack of older papers, with a clipped reproduction and a pen
Ongoing advisory work

Built for a running practice

A dedicated research allocation for advisors handling acquisitions regularly, not just a one-off check.

How Source works for art advisors

1

Describe the piece

2 minutes

Tell us what you’re trying to establish and the archive or library if you know it.

2

Matched in confidence

Within hours

A contributor already based where the record is held reviews the request and quotes.

3

Verified against the original

Days, not weeks

The record is checked in person, not summarised from a database or a model.

4

Delivered, then paid

Stripe secured

Findings land in your inbox in writing, with archival references. Payment released on approval.

Where Source has researchers.

Source has vetted researchers across a growing international network who hold live reading-room credentials at their local archive, library, or private collection. New locations are added daily.

150+Cities
50+Countries
100%Real person
0AI used

The same record. Four ways to get it.

Figures from the last 90 days of fulfilled requests. You see a quote before you commit to anything.

Route
Cost
Time
Fly there yourself
£800–£2,400
3 to 7 days, plus travel
Email the archive or registrar
£0, no reply
3 to 12 months, usually silence
Instruct a freelance researcher cold
£300–£900
2 to 6 weeks, if you find one
Source
£100–£400 typical
Days, someone already there

Something you can stand behind, not just a summary

Provenance information is increasingly being built on citations no one has actually checked against the original document, pulled from tools that summarise rather than verify. At Source, closing that gap is the whole model. Every finding is checked against the primary record itself, in the archive or library where it lives.

"Something you can stand behind if a client asks how a piece’s history was established, not just that it was checked."

An art fair booth before opening, with a painting against the wall, a canvas turned face to the wall, and an open catalogue and loupe on a folding table
Pricing

Priced per piece, with an account for firms doing this regularly.

Every request is quoted before you commit, and there is no success fee. What a request costs depends on how much material has to be searched and where it is held.

Per request

One piece at a time

£100–£400typical per request

Quoted before you commit, so a check can be costed into an acquisition and passed on to your client as a line item.

Library checks run at a cheaper rate than archival research, which is more complex work.

For a running practice

Research account

From £700

Hold a balance on account and draw it down per request at a preferential rate. Sized to your practice rather than billed monthly, so a quiet stretch between fairs is not lost.

  • No new scope and budget approval each time a piece comes up
  • A dedicated point of contact who knows your practice
  • Matched with the contributor best placed to check each piece, wherever the record sits

Questions advisors ask

What does Source do for art advisors?

Source connects you with vetted contributors who go to the archive, registry, or library in person and check what the record actually says. That covers locating the material, reading it, and photographing or transcribing it where needed. It supports acquisitions due diligence, where a database entry or a summarised provenance history is a starting point rather than a conclusion.

Does Source authenticate or attribute works?

No. Source retrieves records and reports what they show. Attribution, authentication, valuation, and legal advice are outside what we do, and what the documents support is a judgement for you and your specialists to make.

Can I show my client how a piece’s history was checked?

Yes. Findings come in writing, with the archival reference for each document consulted, so your client can see which records were checked and what they said. Where the record is silent or incomplete, the report says so rather than filling the gap.

What happens if nothing is found?

Some records do not survive, and some institutions restrict what can be consulted. Where that happens you receive a report setting out what was searched and what it did not show. This is called a No Findings Report, and it is charged at the full rate, because the search work is the same either way. A documented gap is still useful in due diligence, and it is better than an unsourced claim that a piece’s history is clean.

Does Source use AI to research or summarise provenance records?

No. Research is carried out by people, and every finding traces back to a document a contributor has handled. Provenance information is increasingly built on citations no one has checked against the original, pulled from tools that summarise rather than verify. Closing that gap is the whole model.

How much does acquisitions due diligence cost?

It depends on how much material has to be checked and how many references you need verified. Library checks run at a cheaper rate than archival research, which is more complex work. Every request is quoted before you commit, so you see the figure for that piece before anything starts.

How quickly can a piece’s provenance be checked?

A brief can often be turned around within days, because the contributor is already where the record is held rather than travelling to it. The actual timing depends on the institution: its opening hours, whether it requires an appointment, and how much material has to be searched.

A piece in progress? Let’s talk.

If an acquisition is live and the provenance trail needs checking against original records, a short call will clarify how Source can help. No obligation, no cost to scope it.